対外経済上の「攻勢」がもつ潜在性―AIIBは多角主義と地域主義に何をもたらすか [Potentiality of "offensive" on foreign economy - what will AIIB bring to multilateralism and regionalism]

Introduction Xi Jinping under the regime, such as the Asian infrastructure investment bank (AIIB) and "whole area Ichiro", the vast user China's external economic offensive, which has put Rashia in range, is attracting the world's attention. AIIB and The move to establish a new international financial institution, which is called the International Monetary Fund (IMF) , World Bank It was reflected as a challenge to the Bretton Woods institution called row. Regarding the accession to AIIB, It has been said that the close relief of Britain, Australia, South Korea and other allies was caused by the It is also considered to be an event that implies retreat of influence (1) . China is in the thirteenth five-year planning proposal We have adopted the concept of "institutional floor" and expanded influence in global economic governance The AIIB is positioned as part of it (2) . As a background to these Chinese moves, China promotes with other emerging countries after the global financial crisis. There is no doubt that there is an objection to the stagnation of the international financial system reform that it did. Especially the investment ratio of IMF Regarding expansion, the issue that the agreement has been delayed due to delays in the procedures of the US Congress will be re-announced to China It would have recognized the unfairness hidden in the current system. Furthermore, the financial crisis depends on the US and European economy. The vulnerability was revealed, and we have begun to tackle demand creation in the Asian region to overcome it There is also the aspect to say. On the other hand, it is hard to imagine that China will make a full breakthrough with the existing order. China It has benefited economically and politically from a series of rules that support the open world economy. That big As for the multilateral international financial system such as the IMF in the framework, we will generally accept as will be described later, I have taken a position to respect. In addition, 20 countries where China has participated after the global financial crisis · At the regional summit (G20 Summit) , the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision and the Financial Stability Board, It should not be overlooked that it shows a cooperative attitude (3) . The offensive economic offense typified by AIIB, challenging the existing international system and taking it Is it an attempt to replace it? Or progressively while keeping cooperativeness and complementarity with existing systems Will it aim for the improvement of the voice of opinion in a matter? Also, the slowdown in the Chinese economy is a result of such a situation How will it affect? In order to get a prospect of those points, this paper first examines China and multilateral international financial system Consider the historical relationship. Whether AIIB accepts the historical multilateral system Although it is unlikely to be said to be a major departure from the regionalism, regional economic integration. The possibility as a new model of the model is discussed. Finally, based on the above discussion, Japan Consider how to deal with AIIB