Acting Like a State: Non-European Membership of International Organizations in the Nineteenth Century

Ellen Ravndal

    Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

    Abstract

    From their establishment in the nineteenth century, international (intergovernmental) organisations (IOs) have been intimately linked to both international and domestic aspects of state making. This chapter examines non-European IO membership in the nineteenth century and argues that joining an IO could strengthen a states claim to statehood in two ways. First, IOs provided an arena of international politics where non-European states could participate on the basis of formal sovereign equality with the European great powers. Second, joining IOs and implementing their agreements on postal services, telegraphs, intellectual property, and other new technologies and government services, further offered a way for non-European states to prove that they were doing what a modern states were supposed to do. IO membership thus offered the possibility for non-European states both to gain international recognition as sovereign equals, and a means for them to display their progress in extending their domestic jurisdiction within their territories. The chapter problematises the Westphalian unilinear view of state making, as well as the English school expansion thesis, by examining the agency of non-European entities and how their decisions to join IOs both strengthened individual states claims to statehood, and contributed to changes in international society.
    Original languageEnglish
    Title of host publicationDe-Centering State Making: Comparative and International Perspectives,
    Editors Jens Bartelson, Martin Hall and Jan Teorell
    Place of PublicationCheltenham
    PublisherEdward Elgar Publishing
    Pages175-196
    Edition1st
    ISBN (Print)9781788112987
    Publication statusPublished - 2018

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Acting Like a State: Non-European Membership of International Organizations in the Nineteenth Century'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this