Afghanistan

    Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

    Abstract

    This chapter addresses international law in Afghanistan. States where the ‘post-conflict’ period is, in fact, a series of continuing sub-national conflicts, are often coded as ‘failed’ or ‘fragile’ and are also criticized as failing in their embrace of international law. In the case of Afghanistan, such ‘discourses of deficiency’ also erase some important legal history. For most of its history, Afghanistan has been contingent as a Westphalian state. This means that it has also had a fluid relationship with the institutions and norms of international law, including the normative discourse and practice of the international rule of law. Although Afghanistan has been a member of the United Nations since 1946, and thus a contributor to international law in the twentieth century, it is seen more as a subject of international law. After considering these issues, the chapter then highlights the complexity of Afghan’s location within, as well as its relationship with, international law, international legal institutions, and international legal norms.
    Original languageEnglish
    Title of host publicationThe Oxford Handbook of International Law in Asia and the Pacific
    Editors Simon Chesterman, Hisashi Owada, Ben Saul
    Place of PublicationOxford
    PublisherOxford University Press
    Pages675-700
    ISBN (Print)9780191865510
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2019

    Cite this