An Evaluation of Restorative Justice Programs in Taiwan

Hsiao-Fen Huang, Yao-Chung (Lennon) Chang

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle


    This paper aims to evaluate four restorative justice programs in Taiwan: (1) a mediation system; (2) deferred prosecution and conditional suspended sentence; (3) a youth justice system; and (4) the Taiwan Restorative Justice Initiative. In this paper, models proposed in Marshall (Restorative justice: An overview. London: Home Office, 1999) and Braithwaite (British Journal of Criminology 42:563-577, 2002b) are used as criteria to evaluate the four programs. Based on governmental documents, official statistics, and the findings of previous empirical studies, this paper will examine whose needs and power is focused and what types of value are highlighted in those four programs. This paper finds that current restorative justice programs in Taiwan place greater emphasis on offenders than on other parties such as victims and communities. In addition, maximizing and emergent standards that Braithwaite identifies are implemented more in Taiwan's restorative justice programs than constraining standards. This paper suggests that restorative justice practices in Taiwan need to be more concerned with victims' needs and interests, and to strengthen constraining types of restorative justice values.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)45-72
    JournalCrime and Criminal Justice International
    Publication statusPublished - 2012


    Dive into the research topics of 'An Evaluation of Restorative Justice Programs in Taiwan'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this