Antiterrorism Legislation in Australia: A Proportionate Response to the Terrorist Threat?

Christopher Michaelsen

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle


    This article examines key provisions of Australia's antiterrorism legislation introduced in the aftermath of the 11 September attacks. Never before in history has Australia witnessed a comparable overhaul of national security legislation and the introduction of laws that significantly curtail civil liberties and fundamental freedoms. A question that thus needs to be addressed is whether or not Canberra's drastic legislative measures are justified by the severity of the terrorism threat to Australia. It is argued that the actual risk of a terrorism attack occurring on Australian soil is rather low. As a consequence, the Howard government's antiterrorism laws constitute a disproportionate response that has worrisome long-term implications for Australia's legal system and its society more generally.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)321-339
    JournalStudies in Conflict and Terrorism
    Issue number4 July-August 2005
    Publication statusPublished - 2005


    Dive into the research topics of 'Antiterrorism Legislation in Australia: A Proportionate Response to the Terrorist Threat?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this