Assessing Indonesia's normative influence: Wishful thinking or hidden strength

Mathew Davies, Susan Harris-Rimmer

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle


    This article takes a critical stance on Indonesia's normative influence. Whilst normative influence does help explain why Indonesia matters beyond the widespread consensus that it is weak, we also feel that its influence is often overstated. We examine three components of Indonesia's normative influence, modelling, diplomacy and civil society activism. In each component we assess the strengths and weaknesses of Indonesia and identify where wishful thinking predominates over dispassionate analysis. We conclude by arguing that the Jokowi approach to foreign policy destabilises the traditional make-up of normative influence and, if it is pursued into the future, will lead to a re-composition of that influence.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)83-91
    JournalAsia & The Pacific Policy Studies
    Issue number1
    Publication statusPublished - 2016


    Dive into the research topics of 'Assessing Indonesia's normative influence: Wishful thinking or hidden strength'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this