Assessing policy knowledge: A systematic review of three theoretical approaches that are applied to cases of policy change

Jeroen van der Heijden, Johanna Kuhlmann

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    Abstract

    This article seeks to understand how knowledge of the policy process, and especially of policy change, is generated. For three dominant approaches—punctuated equilibrium theory, incremental change theorizing, and institutional isomorphism theorizing—we ask where, by whom, and especially how these theoretical approaches have been applied in empirical studies. Answering these questions is relevant for synthesizing knowledge on policy change across such studies. For a stratified sample of 153 empirical articles, we find that the theories have mainly been applied for single-n or small-n studies at the national level, in western countries, and by scholars affiliated with western universities. We also find that the theoretical approaches are, generally, only partially and loosely operationalized. This limits the generic lessons we can draw from this body of empirical work.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)72-93
    JournalEuropean Policy Analysis
    Volume4
    Issue number1
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2018

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Assessing policy knowledge: A systematic review of three theoretical approaches that are applied to cases of policy change'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this