Balancing Efficiency and Equity in the Tax and Transfer System

    Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

    Abstract

    Tax-transfer systems in developed countries balance a range of competing objectives. They raise revenues to pay for public goods, to achieve redistribution and poverty alleviation, and to address inequality. They provide protection against a range of social risks, either through taxes and transfers across the lifecycle or social insurance. Tax-transfer systems appear quintessentially public – we raise taxes to fund government and provide transfers in the welfare state. However, contemporary tax-transfer systems are interdependent with markets for work and saving and the non-market ‘care’ or household economy. In seeking to balance objectives of equity and efficiency in tax-transfer systems, governments are concerned to maximise policy effectiveness and to minimise adverse outcomes such as reduced propensity in relation to incentives to work or save or to form or dissolve families or households. Governments, meanwhile also want to guarantee the long-term sustainability of the system. This chapter examines the Australian system of taxes and transfers in an international comparative perspective, with a particular focus on family and child benefits. This case study illustrates the hybrid nature of the system and enables an inquiry into whether it is successful in balancing equity and efficiency.
    Original languageEnglish
    Title of host publicationHybrid Public Policy Innovations: Contemporary Policy Beyond Ideology
    Editors Mark Fabian and Robert Breunig
    Place of PublicationLondon
    PublisherRoutledge
    Pages204-231
    Edition1st edition
    ISBN (Print)9780815371809
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2018

    Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Balancing Efficiency and Equity in the Tax and Transfer System'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this