Abstract
Purpose – This chapter explores how select “evidence-based†police scholars
act as gatekeepers to research opportunities, in Canada, thus impeding critical
research that pertains to Black communities.
Methodology/Approach – Using the critical race method of counterstorytelling, the following narrative demonstrates how race and racism may
play a role in the collection and dissemination of research that examines racial
bias in Canadian policing. This methodology aims to refute the notion of critical objectivity, which is often used to promote the principles of evidence-based
policing (EBP).
Findings – Findings suggest that through various powers and levels within
both the policing and academic community, a select number of scholars have
influence over Canadian policing research that explores racial bias and discrimination. As such, research that may help to develop effective and efficient
policing programs to address racial bias, is thwarted.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Title of host publication | Sociology of crime, law, and deviance |
Editors | JAI Press |
Place of Publication | US |
Publisher | JAI Press |
Pages | 63-82 |
Edition | 1st |
ISBN (Print) | 0762302828 |
Publication status | Published - 2022 |