Can Evidence and Voice Influence Policy? A Critical Assessment of Nepal's Forestry Sector Strategy, 2014

Hemant Ojha, Dil Khatri, Krishna Shrestha, Basundhara Bhattarai, Jagadish Baral, Bimbika Sijapati Basnett, Keshab Goutam, Ramesh Sunam, Mani Banjade, Sudeep Jana, Bryan Bushley, Sindhu Prasad Dhungana, Dinesh Paudel

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    Abstract

    This article examines Nepal's recently prepared Forestry Sector Strategy (FSS) (as of 2014) in terms of the use of scientific evidence and the quality of stakeholder participation. By reviewing the content and analyzing the context of its development during 2012-2014, we found that the transitional politics and overt influence of international development agencies dominated the process and content of the FSS. Although the FSS was developed through a significant stakeholder engagement, there was limited use of the available scientific evidence. The FSS was narrowly conceived as a deliverable of supporting aid programs, with limited demand for a politically meaningful policy processes. While civil society groups were consulted, they largely failed to present an independent voice due to their dependence on funding agencies. Our assessment calls for rethinking policy development in a way that facilitates assertive and independent participation by a range of actors and make better use of the available research.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)357-373
    JournalSociety and Natural Resources
    Volume29
    Issue number3
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2016

    Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Can Evidence and Voice Influence Policy? A Critical Assessment of Nepal's Forestry Sector Strategy, 2014'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this