Can we infer vegetation change from peat carbon and nitrogen content? A palaeoecological test from Tasmania, Australia

Michael-Shawn Fletcher, Haidee R Cadd, Simon Haberle

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    Abstract

    We set out to test the ability to detect vegetation change from organic soil nutrient (carbon and nitrogen) composition in the fire-determined forest/non-forest mosaic of western Tasmania, Australia. We find no relationship between organic soil nitrogen and carbon content, despite widely varying local vegetation and fire regimes. Pollen evidence supports the role of fire in driving an initial vegetation state change from forest to non-forest, while carbon and nitrogen analysis of the peat section suggest that factors other than peat nutrient (carbon and nitrogen) content are responsible for the observed meta-stability of non-forest at the site for 7000 years. We find that we cannot validate the use of organic soil nitrogen and carbon content for inferring vegetation type and question the degree of post-European vegetation change inferred from this method.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)1802-1810
    JournalHolocene
    Volume25
    Issue number11
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2015

    Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Can we infer vegetation change from peat carbon and nitrogen content? A palaeoecological test from Tasmania, Australia'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this