Chinese philosophy's hybrid identity

    Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter


    The first part of this chapter describes a key conceptual structure that I argue is common to the writings of the twelfth-century Neo-Confucian philosopher Zhu Xi ���� (1130�C1200) and to a sixth-century Sinitic Buddhist text, the Awakening of Mah��y��na Faith. I propose that this shared conceptual structure bears the hallmarks of a common descent lineage. I further propose that the shared conceptual structure is a homology. Unlike analogous structures, which are functionally similar but share no common ancestral character, homologous structures are modified descendants of a common ancestor. The second part of this paper seeks to identify their common ancestor. In the Awakening of Faith, the genetic signature of this ancestor featured centrally in the development of Sinitic Buddhist philosophy over the course of the Tang and Northern Song periods and subsequently became reinscribed by Zhu Xi to become a defining feature of his metaphysics. I argue that this ancestor can be traced to developments in Southern Chinese Buddhist circles during the latter half of the fifth century. This ancestor is very much a hybrid, a unique product of the fecund engagement with Buddhist constructs derived from both the Indian and Chinese traditions.
    Original languageEnglish
    Title of host publicationWhy Traditional Chinese Philosophy Still Matters: The Relevance of Ancient Wisdom for the Global Age
    Editors Ming Dong Gu
    Place of PublicationChina
    ISBN (Print)9781351356008
    Publication statusPublished - 2018


    Dive into the research topics of 'Chinese philosophy's hybrid identity'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this