Abstract
The primary argument of this article seeks to highlight the irresponsible and insensitive categorisation of the Pacific peoples as ˈclimate refugeesˈ. International actorsˈ interpretation and use of such a term is damaging as it depicts these peoples as a vulnerable, rather than resilient group. The term effectively strips
them of their agency and the potential for their valuable knowledge and efforts to contribute to the fight against a natural phenomenon that proves the most serious threat to humankind
today, climate change. In the first section the international perception will be addressed, in the second section the Oceanic understanding will be explored in contrast, and finally in the
third section, the implications for International Relations will be outlined. In conclusion, we find that the impact of the term 'climate refugees' is detrimental at both the conceptual
and experiential level, making its deconstruction a complex but necessary task.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 158-165 |
Journal | Asia & The Pacific Policy Studies |
Volume | 4 |
Issue number | 1 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 2017 |