Complementarity of no-take marine reserves and individual transferable catch quotas for managing the Line Fishery of the Great Barrier Reef

Lorne Little, Quentin Grafton, Thomas Kompas, Anthony Smith, Andre E Punt, Bruce Mapstone

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    Abstract

    Changes in the management of the fin fish fishery of the Great Barrier Reef motivated us to investigate the combined effects on economic returns and fish biomass of no-take areas and regulated total allowable catch allocated in the form of individual transferable quotas (such quotas apportion the total allowable catch as fishing rights and permits the buying and selling of these rights among fishers). We built a spatially explicit biological and economic model of the fishery to analyze the trade-offs between maintaining given levels of fish biomass and the net financial returns from fishing under different management regimes. Results of the scenarios we modeled suggested that a decrease in total allowable catch at high levels of harvest either increased net returns or lowered them only slightly, but increased biomass by up to 10% for a wide range of reserve sizes and an increase in the reserve area from none to 16% did not greatly change net returns at any catch level. Thus, catch shares and no-take reserves can be complementary and when these methods are used jointly they promote lower total allowable catches when harvest is relatively high and encourage larger no-take areas when they are small.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)333-340
    JournalConservation Biology
    Volume25
    Issue number2
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2011

    Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Complementarity of no-take marine reserves and individual transferable catch quotas for managing the Line Fishery of the Great Barrier Reef'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this