Conclusion: Religious and Political Terrain of the Monologic Imagination

Matt Tomlinson, Julian Millie

    Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

    Abstract

    The book concludes by arguing that religious and political discourse is often characterized by the naturalization of monologue. In such discourse, monologism is treated as natural and dialogism becomes the project that requires the most effort—the emergent, fragile attempt that can never fully succeed. It offers examples from sources as diverse as John Wesley’s advice for preaching, Kim Jong-il’s lethal efforts to make all North Koreans speak in a single voice, a wistful Papua New Guinea man’s claim that in the old days people did not speak so much, and an Australian archbishop’s puzzling declaration that dialogue does not require a willingness to compromise.
    Original languageEnglish
    Title of host publicationThe Monologic Imagination
    Editors Matthew Tomlinson & Julian Millie
    Place of PublicationNew York
    PublisherOxford University Press
    Pages259-267
    Edition1st
    ISBN (Print)9780190652807
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2017

    Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Conclusion: Religious and Political Terrain of the Monologic Imagination'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this