Contemporary Guidance for Stated Preference Studies

Robert J Johnston, Kevin J Boyle, Wiktor Adamowicz, Jeff Bennett, Roy Brouwer, Trudy Ann Cameron, William Michael Hanemann, Nick Hanley, Mandy Ryan, R. Scarpa, Roger Tourangeau, Christian A Vossler

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle


    This article proposes contemporary best-practice recommendations for stated preference (SP) studies used to inform decision making, grounded in the accumulated body of peer-reviewed literature. These recommendations consider the use of SP methods to estimate both use and non-use (passive-use) values, and cover the broad SP domain, including contingent valuation and discrete choice experiments. We focus on applications to public goods in the context of the environment and human health but also consider ways in which the proposed recommendations might apply to other common areas of application. The recommendations recognize that SP results may be used and reused (benefit transfers) by governmental agencies and nongovernmental organizations, and that all such applications must be considered. The intended result is a set of guidelines for SP studies that is more comprehensive than that of the original National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) Blue Ribbon Panel on contingent valuation, is more germane to contemporary applications, and reflects the two decades of research since that time. We also distinguish between practices for which accumulated research is sufficient to support recommendations and those for which greater uncertainty remains. The goal of this article is to raise the quality of SP studies used to support decision making and promote research that will further enhance the practice of these studies worldwide.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)319-405
    JournalJournal of the Association of Environmental and Resource Economist
    Issue number2
    Publication statusPublished - 2017


    Dive into the research topics of 'Contemporary Guidance for Stated Preference Studies'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this