Coping with Nasty Surprises: Improving Risk Management in the Public Sector Using Simplified Bayesian Methods

Mark Matthews, Thomas Kompas

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    Abstract

    Bayesian methods are particularly useful to informing decisions when information is sparse and ambiguous, but decisions involving risks must still be made in a timely manner. Given the utility of these approaches to public policy, this article considers the case for refreshing the general practice of risk management in governance by using a simplified Bayesian approach based on using raw data expressed as 'natural frequencies'. This simplified Bayesian approach, which benefits from the technical advances made in signal processing and machine learning, is suitable for use by non-specialists, and focuses attention on the incidence and potential implications of false positives and false negatives in the diagnostic tests used to manage risk. The article concludes by showing how graphical plots of the incidence of true positives relative to false positives in test results can be used to assess diagnostic capabilities in an organisation-and also inform strategies for capability improvement.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)452-466
    JournalAsia & The Pacific Policy Studies
    Volume2
    Issue number3
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2015

    Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Coping with Nasty Surprises: Improving Risk Management in the Public Sector Using Simplified Bayesian Methods'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this