Crusaders and pragmatists: Australia debates the American alliance

    Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

    Abstract

    The most evident management challenge facing the US–Australia alliance going forward is how Canberra positions itself between its leading trading partner (a rising China) and its long-standing strategic ally (the United States). This has been the dominant foreign policy debate in Australia for more than half a decade. This chapter assess the arguments put forward by the two dominant camps in this debate. The first camp - the ‘Crusaders’ - argue that Canberra needs to ‘double down’ on the American alliance going forward with a view to seeing off the Chinese challenge to the US-led security order in Asia. The second camp - the ‘Pragmatists’ - contend that Canberra needs to establish a greater degree of autonomy from Washington in a manner carefully calibrated to align with Asia’s changing power dynamics. While successive Australian governments have sought to have the best of both worlds by achieving a remarkable degree of foreign policy autonomy within the bounds of the American alliance, the chapter concludes that this will be more challenging to maintain in the future as US expectations of Australia intensify in an increasingly contested Asia.
    Original languageEnglish
    Title of host publicationGlobal Allies: Comparing US Alliances in the 21st Century
    Editors Michael Wesley
    Place of PublicationCanberra
    PublisherANU Press
    Pages77-89p
    Edition1st
    ISBN (Print)9781760461188
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2017

    Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Crusaders and pragmatists: Australia debates the American alliance'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this