Enthusiastic portrayal of 3D bioprinting in the media: Ethical side effects

Frederic Gilbert, John Noel Viana, Cathal D O'Connell, Susan Dodds

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    Abstract

    There has been a surge in mass media reports extolling the potential for using three-dimensional printing of biomaterials (3D bioprinting) to treat a wide range of clinical conditions. Given that mass media is recognized as one of the most important sources of health and medical information for the general public, especially prospective patients, we report and discuss the ethical consequences of coverage of 3D bioprinting in the media. First, we illustrate how positive mass media narratives of a similar biofabricated technology, namely the Macchiarini scaffold tracheas, which was involved in lethal experimental human trials, influenced potential patient perceptions. Second, we report and analyze the positively biased and enthusiastic portrayal of 3D bioprinting in mass media. Third, we examine the lack of regulation and absence of discussion about risks associated with bioprinting technology. Fourth, we explore how media misunderstanding is dangerously misleading the narrative about the technology.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)94-102
    JournalBioethics
    Volume32
    Issue number2
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2018

    Cite this