Evaluating Participatory Modeling: Developing a Framework for Cross-Case Analysis

Natalie A. Jones, Pascal Perez, Thomas Measham, Gail J. Kelly, Patrick D'Aquino, Katherine Daniell, Anne Dray, Niels Ferrand, Katherine Daniell

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    Abstract

    Participatory modeling is increasingly recognized as an effective way to assist collective decision-making processes in the domain of natural resource management. This article introduces a framework for evaluating projects that have adopted a participatory modeling approach. This evaluation framework-known as the "Protocol of Canberra"-was developed through a collaboration between French and Australian researchers engaged in participatory modeling and evaluation research. The framework seeks to assess the extent to which different participatory modeling initiatives not only modify perceptions among and interactions between participants, but also contribute to collective decision-making. The article discusses the development of the framework and it's application to three case-studies, two from Australia and one from the Pacific Island of the Republic of Kiribati. The article concludes with some comments for future use of the framework in a range of participatory modeling contexts.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)1180-1195
    JournalEnvironmental Management (New York)
    Volume44
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2009

    Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Evaluating Participatory Modeling: Developing a Framework for Cross-Case Analysis'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this