Examining equity: A multidimensional framework for assessing equity in payments for ecosystem services

Melanie McDermott; Sango Mahanty; Kate Schreckenberg

doi:10.1016/j.envsci.2012.10.006

Examining equity: A multidimensional framework for assessing equity in payments for ecosystem services

Melanie McDermott, Sango Mahanty, Kate Schreckenberg

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article

Abstract

Concern over social equity dominates current debates about payments for ecosystem services and reduced deforestation and forest degradation (REDD+). Yet, despite the apprehension that these initiatives may undermine equity, the term is generally left unde

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	416-427
Journal	Environmental Science and Policy
Volume	33
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2012.10.006
Publication status	Published - 2013

Access to Document

10.1016/j.envsci.2012.10.006

http://hdl.handle.net/1885/29464

Cite this

@article{87346139a3924e918fd2da58c83d3ada,

title = "Examining equity: A multidimensional framework for assessing equity in payments for ecosystem services",

abstract = "Concern over social equity dominates current debates about payments for ecosystem services and reduced deforestation and forest degradation (REDD+). Yet, despite the apprehension that these initiatives may undermine equity, the term is generally left unde",

author = "Melanie McDermott and Sango Mahanty and Kate Schreckenberg",

year = "2013",

doi = "10.1016/j.envsci.2012.10.006",

language = "English",

volume = "33",

pages = "416--427",

journal = "Environmental Science and Policy",

issn = "1462-9011",

publisher = "Elsevier BV",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Examining equity: A multidimensional framework for assessing equity in payments for ecosystem services

AU - McDermott, Melanie

AU - Mahanty, Sango

AU - Schreckenberg, Kate

PY - 2013

Y1 - 2013

N2 - Concern over social equity dominates current debates about payments for ecosystem services and reduced deforestation and forest degradation (REDD+). Yet, despite the apprehension that these initiatives may undermine equity, the term is generally left unde

AB - Concern over social equity dominates current debates about payments for ecosystem services and reduced deforestation and forest degradation (REDD+). Yet, despite the apprehension that these initiatives may undermine equity, the term is generally left unde

U2 - 10.1016/j.envsci.2012.10.006

DO - 10.1016/j.envsci.2012.10.006

M3 - Article

SN - 1462-9011

VL - 33

SP - 416

EP - 427

JO - Environmental Science and Policy

JF - Environmental Science and Policy

ER -

Examining equity: A multidimensional framework for assessing equity in payments for ecosystem services

Abstract

Access to Document

Fingerprint

Cite this