Forensic Social Anthropology

David Trigger, David Martin, Paul Christopher Memmott, Phillip Winn, Paul Burke, Nicolas Peterson, Peter Veth, Sarah Holcombe, Kingley Palmer

    Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

    Abstract

    In what follows we make it clear that anthropologists called as experts in legal proceedings are legally obliged to eschew any tendency to advocacy in relation to the groups or individuals about which they provide expert evidence. We briefly chart the increasingly diverse and theoretically eclectic discipline, in part through the case studies, as these provide analyses of the range of contexts within which expert anthropologists work as interlocutors with (often) non-English speaking peoples, and typically (but certainly not always) in situations of marked social marginality and relative powerlessness. Indeed, it is because of the discipline’s history of research with the non-dominant, the socially excluded and the colonised that from the latter half of the twentieth century at least anthropology’s role in advocacy for the marginalised has tended to identify the discipline. This legacy can have a problematic effect both on the legal understanding of the expert anthropologist’s role within the court context, and on anthropologists’ capacity, and willingness, to set aside such advocacy in order to comply with the requirements of expert witnesses.
    Original languageEnglish
    Title of host publicationExpert Evidence: Law, Practice, Procedure and Advocacy
    Editors Ian R Freckelton & Hugh Selby
    Place of PublicationSydney
    PublisherThomson Reuters
    Pages36-51
    Edition5
    ISBN (Print)9780455231624
    Publication statusPublished - 2013

    Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Forensic Social Anthropology'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this