Gatekeepers: A Comparative Critique of Admission to the Legal Profession and Japan's New Law Schools

Kent Anderson, Kent Anderson, Trevor Ryan

    Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

    Abstract

    Introduction Legal education in Japan has been fundamentally reconstituted in the first decade of the twenty-first century.1 These changes are situated within both international trends and far-reaching domestic administrative and judicial reforms. To date, the literature concerning Japan’s legal education reforms has focused on the most visible change: the repositioning of graduate law schools (hōka daigakuin) as the central institution in the training of Japan’s legal profession (in the narrow sense of judges, attorneys and prosecutors). In the English literature, there is consensus that retention of the ‘bottleneck’ entry examination (shihō shiken) governing entry to the apprenticeship/practical phase of training (‘Bar Examination’ is the closest English equivalent) is a grave threat to the fragile infancy of the 74 new law schools.2 This concern exposes a deeper dynamic about who controls admission to the legal profession and by what means.
    Original languageEnglish
    Title of host publicationLegal Education in Asia: globalization, change and contexts
    Editors Stacey Steele and Kathryn Taylor
    Place of PublicationAbingdon, UK and New York, USA
    PublisherRoutledge, Taylor & Francis Group
    Pages45-67
    Edition1st
    ISBN (Print)9780415494338
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2010

    Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Gatekeepers: A Comparative Critique of Admission to the Legal Profession and Japan's New Law Schools'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this