Historical Sociology in International Relations: The Challenge of the Global

Julian Go, George Lawson, Benajim de Carvalho

    Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter


    Historical International Relations (HIR) and Historical Sociology (HS) are intimately connected, as the recovery of historical thinking within the discipline happened largely through drawing on works of HS. Thus, distinguishing between the two is a question less of different ontologies or epistemologies, but of definition or orientation. While much of the work in HIR is sociological in character, HS covers a broad spectrum of HIR as well. At its core, HS has been concerned with understanding the roots of our current predicament. That is, how can we make sense of modernity through understanding the origins of, and paths to, modernity? Given the recent critique of the largely statist approach historical sociologists have tended to follow, we believe the most productive way of providing an overview of HS is through gauging the productive tension underlying a discussion of historical sociology vs global historical sociology. This allows for the double aim of providing an overview of HS relevant to IR, while at the same time, pointing at ways to make HS - and HIR more generally - more global.
    Original languageEnglish
    Title of host publicationRoutledge Handbook of Historical International Relations
    Editors Benjamin de Carvalho, Julia Costa Lopez and Halvard Leira
    Place of PublicationUK
    ISBN (Print)9780815347644
    Publication statusPublished - 2021


    Dive into the research topics of 'Historical Sociology in International Relations: The Challenge of the Global'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this