Incremental, Systemic, And Paradigmatic Reform Of Investor-State Arbitration

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle


    In Imperfect Alternatives: Institutional Choice and the Reform of Investment Law, Sergio Puig and Gregory Shaffer introduce comparative institutional analysis to evaluate alternative processes for resolving investment disputes. The impetus for this article is clear: many states view investor-state arbitration as akin to a horse that has bolted from the barn. Wishing to close the stable door, a wide range of states are considering the merits of various reform proposals. Puig and Shaffer's comprehensive and balanced framework for assessing the tradeoffs involved in making different choices is thus a welcome and timely intervention in these (often highly polarized) debates.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)410-432
    JournalAmerican Journal of International Law
    Issue number3
    Publication statusPublished - 2018


    Dive into the research topics of 'Incremental, Systemic, And Paradigmatic Reform Of Investor-State Arbitration'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this