Indonesia: why democratization has not reduced corruption

    Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingEntry for encyclopedia/dictionary

    Abstract

    The author focuses on Indonesia, the world’s fourth-most populous country and largest Muslim nation. From the Dutch colonial era to the tyranny of Suharto, corruption became deeply interwoven with the Indonesian state. Aristocratic families came to view the state as a personal cash machine. The author examines the important issue as to why democratization there has not led to a concomitant decline in corruption, and lays blame at the expensive and inefficient system of funding political campaigns. Rather than swirling around the presidency, corruption became multi-tiered and decentralized. Corruption has not been uncontested however; the Corruption Eradication Commission has arrested hundreds of politicians, mayors, judges and others, although the actual prison time served is typically minimal and some convicted officials have been re-elected. However, the author emphasizes throughout that corruption persists in Indonesia because the likely gains exceed the costs.
    Original languageEnglish
    Title of host publicationHandbook on the Geographies of Corruption
    Editors Barney Warf
    Place of PublicationUK
    PublisherEdward Elgar Publishing Limited
    Pages350-364
    ISBN (Print)9781786434746
    Publication statusPublished - 2018

    Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Indonesia: why democratization has not reduced corruption'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this