Iraq, alliances and crisis management

Coral Bell

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    Abstract

    The issue to be explored here is whether the American alliance structure can or will stand up to the political pressures generated by such a technique of crisis management, as exemplified in Iraq. Also whether such techniques are necessary, and alternatively whether the traditional allies are going to be of much relevance to this particular kind of conflict. Donald Rumsfeld, the most candid and least tact-impeded of current Administration spokesmen, has implied doubt on that point, remarking in one of his TV interviews that 'the mission determines the coalition, not the coalition the mission'. The NATO allies, other than Britain, had no part to speak of in the strategy devised for Afghanistan or Iraq, except in the provision of peacekeepers afterwards. The really vital 'co-belligerents' (to revive an old World War II term which seems likely to be useful for this conflict) for Afghanistan were Pakistan, the Northern Alliance, the Central Asian Republics, and Russia, whose cooperation must have been crucial to getting US forces and bases into Central Asia. China's acquiescience was also obviously important, and India's. For Iraq they are Kuwait, Qatar and Bahrein, along diplomatically with Britain.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)223-233
    JournalAustralian Journal of International Affairs
    Volume57
    Issue number2
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2003

    Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Iraq, alliances and crisis management'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this