Looking beneath the iceberg: can shame and pride be handled restoratively in cases of workplace bullying

Valerie Braithwaite, Eliza Ahmed

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    Abstract

    Central to restorative justice interventions that follow revised reintegrative shaming theory (Ahmed, Harris, Braithwaite & Braithwaite, 2001) is individual capacity to manage shame and pride in safe and supportive spaces. From a random sample of 1,967 Australians who responded to a national crime survey, 1,045 completed a module about bullying experiences at work over the past year, along with measures of shame and pride management (the MOSS-SASD and MOPS scales). Those who identified themselves as having bullied others were pride-focused, not shame-focused. They were more likely to express narcissistic pride over their work success, lauding their feats over others, and were less likely to express humble pride, sharing their success with others. In contrast, victims were defined by acknowledged and displaced shame over work task failures. In addition to these personal impediments to social reintegration, those who bullied and those targeted had low trust in others, particularly professionals. While these findings do not challenge macro interventions for culture change through more respectful and restorative practices, they provide a basis for setting boundaries for the appropriate use of restorative justice meetings to address particular workplace bullying complaints.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)209-234
    JournalThe International Journal of Restorative Justice
    Volume2
    Issue number2
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2019

    Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Looking beneath the iceberg: can shame and pride be handled restoratively in cases of workplace bullying'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this