Mapping practices and spatiality in IR knowledge production: from detachment to emancipation

Beverley Loke, Catherine Owen

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle


    This article conceptualises the variety of approaches taken by International Relations (IR) scholars around the world to dominant forms of knowledge production in IR. In doing so, it advances Global IR debates along two axes: on practices and on spatiality. We argue that binary conceptions are unhelpful and that engagement with knowledge production practices is best captured by a landscape of complexity, requiring a deeper interrogation of positionality, globality and context. Using 26 qualitative interviews with IR academics at institutions in East Asia, South Asia, the Middle East, Eurasia and Africa, we construct a typology comprising seven modes of engagement that capture the conflicted relationships to dominant forms and practices of knowledge production in IR. The typology is intended to highlight the variation, complexity and contextual particularities in global IR knowledge production practices and to enable an interrogation of spatial hierarchies that unsettle conventional geopolitical West/non-West fault-lines.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)30-57
    JournalEuropean Journal of International Relations
    Issue number1
    Publication statusPublished - 2021


    Dive into the research topics of 'Mapping practices and spatiality in IR knowledge production: from detachment to emancipation'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this