Motivating Management: Corporate Compliance in Environmental Protection

Neil Gunningham, Dorothy Thornton, Robert A Kagan

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    Abstract

    Based on interviews with facility managers in the electroplating and chemical industries, this study examines regulated firms' perceptions of how various instrumental, normative, and social factors motivated their firms' environmental actions. We found that "implicit general deterrence" (the overall effect of sustained inspection and enforcement activity) was far more important than either specific or general deterrence, and that deterrence in any form was of far greater concern to small and medium-sized enterprises than it was to large ones. Most reputation-sensitive firms in the environmentally sensitive chemical industry chose to go substantially beyond compliance for reasons that related to risk management and to the perceived need to protect their social license to operate. Almost half our respondents also provided normative explanations for why they complied. Overall, we conclude that there are various, often interwoven, strands that must be taken into account in understanding what motivates corporate environmental behavior, and how they play out depends very much on the size and sophistication of companies themselves and on the characteristics of the industry sector within which they are located.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)289-316
    JournalLaw and Policy
    Volume27
    Issue number2
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2005

    Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Motivating Management: Corporate Compliance in Environmental Protection'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this