Muddied waters: Revealing methodological confusion in Australia's environmental impact assessment process

Maya Suzuki

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    Abstract

    Environmental impact assessment (EIA) is a tool which identifies and evaluates the likely impacts of a development project on the environment, economy and society. It forms an integral part of the regulatory framework of the Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999 (Cth) (EPBC Act). There appears to be, however, an issue which is undermining EIA's intended purposes to facilitate informed decision-making and achieve the environmental objectives of the EPBC Act: the methodological clarity of EIA. Currently, there is no widely accepted method for assessing environmental and economic impacts. This study exposes the methodological confusion in the assessment of environmental and economic impacts of mining projects assessed under the EPBC Act and analyses the implications of this issue for EIA's ability to achieve its intended purposes. The article concludes that failure by the legislature to address methodological confusion risks undermining the legitimacy and effectiveness of EIA in Australia.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)267-281
    JournalEnvironmental and Planning Law Journal
    Volume37
    Issue number2
    Publication statusPublished - 2020

    Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Muddied waters: Revealing methodological confusion in Australia's environmental impact assessment process'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this