Parasites and politics: Why cross-cultural studies must control for relatedness, proximity and covariation

Lindell Bromham, Xia Hua, Marcel Cardillo, Hilde Schneemann, Simon Greenhill

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    Abstract

    A growing number of studies seek to identify predictors of broad-scale patterns in human cultural diversity, but three sources of non-independence in human cultural variables can bias the results of cross-cultural studies. First, related cultures tend to have many traits in common, regardless of whether those traits are functionally linked. Second, societies in geographical proximity will share many aspects of culture, environment and demography. Third, many cultural traits covary, leading to spurious relationships between traits. Here, we demonstrate tractable methods for dealing with all three sources of bias. We use cross-cultural analyses of proposed associations between human cultural traits and parasite load to illustrate the potential problems of failing to correct for these three forms of statistical non-independence. Associations between parasite stress and sociosexuality, authoritarianism, democracy and language diversity are weak or absent once relatedness and proximity are taken into account, and parasite load has no more power to explain variation in traditionalism, religiosity and collectivism than other measures of biodiversity, climate or population size do. Without correction for statistical non-independence and covariation in cross-cultural analyses, we risk misinterpreting associations between culture and environment.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)1-22pp
    JournalRoyal Society Open Science
    Volume5
    Issue number8
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2018

    Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Parasites and politics: Why cross-cultural studies must control for relatedness, proximity and covariation'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this