Polynesian Seafaring and American Horizons: A Response To Jones and Klar

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle


    The hypothesis presented by Jones and Klar (2005) that elements of prehistoric Chumash technology and language arrived from East Polynesia is considered. Trans-oceanic diffusion in general should not be rejected out of hand, but in this case it is improbable that it involved East Polynesia. There are substantial differences in the sewn-plank canoes at issue and the compound hooks are of a general form that is not confined to Polynesia. The chronology of East Polynesian colonization is probably too late for diffusion to southern California before A.D. 700. East Polynesian seafaring may have been inadequate to reach the Californian coast. If the explanation is diffusionary, then a source in East Asia is more plausible.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)759-763
    JournalAmerican Antiquity
    Issue number4
    Publication statusPublished - 2006


    Dive into the research topics of 'Polynesian Seafaring and American Horizons: A Response To Jones and Klar'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this