Promoting Domestic Reforms through Regionalism

Philippa Dee, Anne McNaughton

    Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

    Abstract

    There is a strong presumption among economists that domestic reforms are promoted by regionalism. Yet strong empirical evidence for this proposition is lacking. This paper examines both the theoretical arguments and empirical evidence on this issue, drawing on the relevant economic, political, and legal literature. The authors argue that in general, the case for reciprocity in domestic reforms is weak. In the one case where a regional agreement appears to have promoted domestic reform—the European Union (EU)—the enforcement mechanisms used by the European Court of Justice played a significant role. But those mechanisms are not unique. Instead, the authors argue that the EU’s success was because domestic constituents were empowered to take action against uncompetitive regulation. Thus the EU promoted economic reform in sensitive, behind-the-border areas because it overcame the problem of loss of sovereignty by internalizing the political battle to domestic interests, and yet still provided a non-political frame of reference for the debate.
    Original languageEnglish
    Title of host publicationServices Trade Reform: Making Sense of It
    Editors Philippa Dee
    Place of PublicationSingapore
    PublisherWorld Scientific Publishing Co.
    Pages381-427
    Edition1st
    ISBN (Print)9789814508742
    Publication statusPublished - 2014

    Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Promoting Domestic Reforms through Regionalism'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this