"Resetting the Relationship" in Indigenous Child Protection: Public Hope and Private Reality

Mary Ivec, Valerie Braithwaite, Nathan Harris

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    Abstract

    A qualitative study explored the private realities of forty-five Australian Indigenous parents and carers who had experiences with child protection authorities. Interviews focused on the nature of the relationship between parents and authorities, how these regulatory encounters served to enlist or dissolve cooperation, and how child-focused outcomes could be delivered. The descriptions of encounters with authorities challenged the public hope for reconciliation between government and Indigenous Australians through reports of procedural injustice, failure by the authority to communicate and demonstrate soundness of purpose, and through lack of interest in identity affirmation and relationship building. In spite of these perceptions of integrity failings in how child protection authorities have operated, a positive role was acknowledged for authorities' future involvement, albeit with different strategies from those currently experienced. How this progression might be facilitated by principles of restorative justice and responsive regulation is discussed.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)80-103
    JournalLaw and Policy
    Volume34
    Issue number1
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2012

    Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of '"Resetting the Relationship" in Indigenous Child Protection: Public Hope and Private Reality'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this