Restorative Justice as Evidence-Based Sentencing

Heather Strang, Lawrence W Sherman

    Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

    Abstract

    This article takes a look at the conclusions from twenty years of restorative justice (RJ) innovations and their status as of 2011. The discussion is primarily concerned with the face-to-face restorative justice conference (RJC), which combines offenders, their victims, and their respective families and communities, in order to decide what the offender should do to answer for his crime/s. It analyzes the evidence for the comparative effectiveness of justice with and without RJ conferences, and reviews the history and theories of RJ. The next section summarizes the logic of evaluation research on RJ, and is followed by reports of the available research on six given comparisons. This article also studies the global social movement that promotes the use of RJ.
    Original languageEnglish
    Title of host publicationThe Oxford Handbook of Sentencing and Corrections
    Editors Joan Petersilia and Kevin Reitz
    Place of PublicationNew York
    PublisherOxford University Press
    Pages215-246
    Edition1
    ISBN (Print)9780199730148
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2011

    Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Restorative Justice as Evidence-Based Sentencing'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this