Results at any Cost? The Legacy of 2002 in Koroba-Lake Koiago Open Electorate

    Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

    Abstract

    In June 2007, the people of Koroba-Lake Kopiago went to the polls for the fourth time in five years. The election was of particular interest because Koroba-Lake Kopiago was one of the six open electorates in which the 2002 general election had been deemed to have failed, and was one of the 10 electorates around the country that had had a limited preferential voting (LPV) by-election prior to the general election. It is also an electorate that has been subject to election studies in the past (see Haley 2002, 2004, 2006 and Robinson 2002) and for which there is consequently a great deal of comparative longitudinal data. This chapter draws upon observations and findings of both the 2006 Koroba-Lake Kopiago by-election observation team (Haley 2006) and the 2007 Koroba-Lake Kopiago domestic observation team. It finds that the election was anything but fair, yet despite fraud and malpractice on a scale never before seen the election was widely held to have been successful and a significant improvement on 2002. It further suggests that the national government and Papua New Guinea Electoral Commission (PNGEC) were willing to accept results at any cost in order to avoid a repetition of the events of 2002 (Somare 2006:5), and advocates a more honest assessment of future elections. The integrity of elections cannot merely be asserted but must be demonstrated.
    Original languageEnglish
    Title of host publicationElection 2007: The Shift to Limited Preferential Voting in Papua New Guinea
    Editors R J May, Ray Anere, Nicole Haley and Katherine Wheen
    Place of PublicationCanberra Australia
    PublisherANU Press
    Pages347-383
    Edition1st
    ISBN (Print)9781922144300
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2013

    Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Results at any Cost? The Legacy of 2002 in Koroba-Lake Koiago Open Electorate'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this