Space, Theory, and Hegemony: The Dual Crises of Asian Area Studies and Cultural Studies

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    Abstract

    The classical form of area studies based on the notion of culture-language areas has been critiqued by globalization theorists and poststructuralists as old-fashioned (pre-globalization) and theoretically naive (empirical). However, the death of area studies would leave students of Asian societies in a theoretically and politically fraught situation. While the essentialism of classical area studies must be abandoned, the critiques presented by globalization and poststructuralist theorists often presume that capitalist globalization entails the erasure of borders, the homogenization of cultures, and the end of spatiality as a domain of theoretically significant difference. These views are critiqued as ideologically driven and empirically unfounded. Geography remains a theoretically significant domain of discursive and cultural difference under globalization. A theoretically sophisticated area studies project therefore remains an essential method for understanding the twenty-first century world.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)1-41
    JournalSojourn
    Volume18
    Issue number1
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2018

    Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Space, Theory, and Hegemony: The Dual Crises of Asian Area Studies and Cultural Studies'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this