State Responsibility and Prevention in the Responsibility to Protect: Communal Violence in India

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    Abstract

    This article responds to the 2013 UN Secretary General's (UNSG) annual report on the Responsibility to Protect (R2P), titled 'State Responsibility and Prevention'. The orientation of R2P as a tool for addressing risk factors for atrocity crimes in domestic contexts indicates a conceptual deepening and widening of R2P to provide states with an atrocity prevention lens within their jurisdiction. This article examines state policies and practices of protecting civilians during communal violence in India, arguing that progress on the First Pillar of R2P necessitates a conceptual shift at both the international level and at the domestic level. The politics surrounding communal violence in India provides an important case study to question the salience of R2P norms for domestic practices of state responsibility and prevention that are currently being promoted in the unsg agenda on R2P, and considers the implications this report has for states committed to a narrow interpretation of R2P.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)56-80
    JournalGlobal Responsibility to Protect
    Volume7
    Issue number1
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2015

    Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'State Responsibility and Prevention in the Responsibility to Protect: Communal Violence in India'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this