The English School: History and Primary Institutions as Empirical International Relations Theory?

Barry Buzan, George Lawson

    Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingEntry for encyclopedia/dictionary


    How does the English School work as part of Empirical International Relations (IR) theory? The English School depends heavily on historical accounts, and this article makes the case that history and theory should be seen as co-constitutive rather than as separate enterprises. Empirical IR theorists need to think about their own relationship to this question and clarify what “historical sensitivity” means to them. The English School offers both distinctive taxonomies for understanding the structure of international society, and an empirically constructed historical approach to identifying the primary institutions that define international society. If Empirical IR is open to historical-interpretive accounts, then its links to the English School are in part strong, because English School structural accounts would qualify; they are, in other ways, weak because the normative theory part of the English School would not qualify. Lying behind this judgement is a deeper issue: if Empirical IR theory confines itself to regularity-deterministic causal accounts, then there can be no links to English School work. Undertaking English School insights will help open up a wider view of Empirical IR theory.
    Original languageEnglish
    Title of host publicationThe Oxford Encyclopedia of Empirical International Relations Theory
    Editors William R Thompson
    Place of PublicationUnited States of America
    PublisherOxford University Press
    ISBN (Print)9780190667627
    Publication statusPublished - 2018


    Dive into the research topics of 'The English School: History and Primary Institutions as Empirical International Relations Theory?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this