The limits of design for cosmopolitan democracy

Jonathan Kuyper

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle


    Most scholars and practitioners agree that world politics suffers from a democratic deficit. In response, proposals for cosmopolitan democracy are not in short supply. Indeed the meaning of the term cosmopolitan democracy is now incredibly broad, encompassing a wide variety of institutional and normative prescriptions intended to foster more democratically legitimate standards at the transnational level. However, there is a distinct irony to these proposals. The increased interdependence and cooperation of actors at the transnational level - spurred on by globalization - make cosmopolitan democracy a necessary vision. Simultaneously, globalization amplifies power imbalances and thus skews the interests of different agents. Hence, globalization makes cosmopolitan democracy a necessary but distant prospect. This article seeks to address the empirical institutional constraints against building cosmopolitan democracy using historical institutionalism to stress the limitations of design. A normative argument is also built focusing on the relative merits of democratic experimentalism as a way to advance the cosmopolitan project whilst undercutting the complications noted in the analytical section of the article.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)28-47
    JournalPublic Reason: Journal of Political and Moral Philosophy
    Issue number1-2
    Publication statusPublished - 2012


    Dive into the research topics of 'The limits of design for cosmopolitan democracy'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this