Abstract
The aims of this chapter are fourfold. The first is to examine whether moral injury
ought to be considered conceptually and practically distinct from Post Traumatic
Stress (PTS) or Post Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD). The second is to canvas the
contributions of philosophy, theology and sociology to understanding moral injury,
and to review the philosophical conversations about unseen wounds. The third aim is
to assess companion studies of moral injury (or rather the lack of them) among
Australia’s major operating partners, principally New Zealand, Britain, Canada, the
Netherlands and the United States. The final aim is to determine the relevance of
American accounts of moral injury to the Australian experience. While the United
States and Australia have a shared military history and enjoy a close security
relationship, significant factors distinguish their armed forces and experience of
uniformed service. American philosophical conversations about moral injury may be
helpful, but since moral injury is directly linked to home culture, empirical research of
the Australian Defence Force is needed to comprehend the Australian strain of moral
injury.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Commissioning body | Australian Centre for the Studies of Armed Conflict and Society for the Centre of Defence Leadership |
Publication status | Published - 2016 |