Three ways to understand state actors in international negotiations: Climate change in the Clinton years (1993-2000)

Christian Downie

doi:10.1162/glep_a_00196

Three ways to understand state actors in international negotiations: Climate change in the Clinton years (1993-2000)

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article

Abstract

Different theoretical perspectives ask different questions about state behavior in international negotiations. For example, are governments moved by domestic political pressures? Are transnational networks influencing state behavior? Or do international r

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	22-40
Journal	Global Environmental Politics
Volume	13
Issue number	4
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1162/glep_a_00196
Publication status	Published - 2013

Access to Document

10.1162/glep_a_00196

Cite this

@article{4716bf4f5a5142c9a6ac6bdca4470545,

title = "Three ways to understand state actors in international negotiations: Climate change in the Clinton years (1993-2000)",

abstract = "Different theoretical perspectives ask different questions about state behavior in international negotiations. For example, are governments moved by domestic political pressures? Are transnational networks influencing state behavior? Or do international r",

author = "Christian Downie",

year = "2013",

doi = "10.1162/glep_a_00196",

language = "English",

volume = "13",

pages = "22--40",

journal = "Global Environmental Politics",

issn = "1526-3800",

publisher = "MIT Press Journals",

number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Three ways to understand state actors in international negotiations: Climate change in the Clinton years (1993-2000)

AU - Downie, Christian

PY - 2013

Y1 - 2013

N2 - Different theoretical perspectives ask different questions about state behavior in international negotiations. For example, are governments moved by domestic political pressures? Are transnational networks influencing state behavior? Or do international r

AB - Different theoretical perspectives ask different questions about state behavior in international negotiations. For example, are governments moved by domestic political pressures? Are transnational networks influencing state behavior? Or do international r

U2 - 10.1162/glep_a_00196

DO - 10.1162/glep_a_00196

M3 - Article

SN - 1526-3800

VL - 13

SP - 22

EP - 40

JO - Global Environmental Politics

JF - Global Environmental Politics

IS - 4

ER -

Three ways to understand state actors in international negotiations: Climate change in the Clinton years (1993-2000)

Abstract

Access to Document

Fingerprint

Cite this