University of Western Australia v Gray: An Academic Duty to Commercialise Research?

Thomas Faunce, Thomas Faunce, Timothy Vines

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle


    In an era of tightening university budgets and pressure to commercialise academic knowledge, many higher education institutions see the exploitation of new inventions and discoveries, through the use of patents, as an additional revenue stream. To that end, many such organisations have in place policies and by-laws which regulate "ownership" and disclosure of inventions created by employees. This can be seen as a continuation of an ongoing process of shifting universities from institutes of "pure research" to commercial operations, seeking to maximise financial gains from the efforts of their researchers. However, new opportunities present new risks. One of the last Federal Court decisions by the High Court of Australia's new Chief Justice, Justice French, in University of Western Australia v Gray [2008] FCA 498 explores some of the challenges which Australian university administrators and policy developers will need to overcome if an appropriate balance between private interests and public good is to be maintained in this context.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)419-426
    JournalJournal of law and medicine
    Publication statusPublished - 2008


    Dive into the research topics of 'University of Western Australia v Gray: An Academic Duty to Commercialise Research?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this