Updating Martin's global extinction model

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle


    Australia has been cited as a weak link in anthropogenic models of megafauna extinction, but recent work suggests instead that the evidence for rapid extinction shortly after human arrival is robust. The global model is revisited, based on the contention that late Pleistocene megafauna extinctions took place rapidly on islands, and some islands (such as Australia and the Americas) are much larger than others. Modern dating methods are increasingly able to refine chronologies, and careful scrutiny suggests that hundreds of dates should be deleted from archives. An updated summary of results from New Zealand, North America and Australia is presented, with a brief discussion on why temperate refugia offering protection from climate change ultimately did not work, strongly supporting the global extinction hypothesis pioneered by Paul Martin.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)2522-2529
    JournalQuaternary Science Reviews
    Publication statusPublished - 2008


    Dive into the research topics of 'Updating Martin's global extinction model'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this