TY - JOUR
T1 - Valuing the environmental, cultural and social impacts of open-cut coal mining in the Hunter Valley of New South Wales, Australia
AU - Gillespie, Robert
AU - Bennett, Jeff
PY - 2012
Y1 - 2012
N2 - Open-cut coal mining projects can have a range of environmental, cultural and social impacts that, in New South Wales (NSW), Australia, are required to be addressed as part of the environmental assessment (EA) process. While these impacts are often addressed within separate impact assessment frameworks, it is possible to undertake EA as an applied economic analysis with non-market valuation methods such as choice modelling (CM) used to incorporate environmental, cultural and social impacts. A CM study of the proposed extension of the Warkworth Mine in the Hunter Valley of NSW found that community well-being declined with increased clearing of endangered ecological communities (EECs), loss of highly significant Aboriginal sites and displacement of rural families from affected villages, but increased with the length of time that the mine provides employment and with the planting or protection of EECs as offsets. Community preferences for these offsets ranged from a ratio of 1.4:1 for protection of existing remnant EECs in the region to a ratio of 4.0:1 for planting of EECs.
AB - Open-cut coal mining projects can have a range of environmental, cultural and social impacts that, in New South Wales (NSW), Australia, are required to be addressed as part of the environmental assessment (EA) process. While these impacts are often addressed within separate impact assessment frameworks, it is possible to undertake EA as an applied economic analysis with non-market valuation methods such as choice modelling (CM) used to incorporate environmental, cultural and social impacts. A CM study of the proposed extension of the Warkworth Mine in the Hunter Valley of NSW found that community well-being declined with increased clearing of endangered ecological communities (EECs), loss of highly significant Aboriginal sites and displacement of rural families from affected villages, but increased with the length of time that the mine provides employment and with the planting or protection of EECs as offsets. Community preferences for these offsets ranged from a ratio of 1.4:1 for protection of existing remnant EECs in the region to a ratio of 4.0:1 for planting of EECs.
U2 - 10.1080/21606544.2012.714970
DO - 10.1080/21606544.2012.714970
M3 - Article
VL - 1
SP - 276
EP - 288
JO - Journal of Environmental Economics and Policy
JF - Journal of Environmental Economics and Policy
IS - 3
ER -