Why we should retain Nothofagus sensu lato

Robert S Hill, Gregory J. Jordan, Michael Macphail

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle


    We present the case that the fossil record of Nothofagaceae, which is much more extensive in terms of species numbers than the living species, cannot be dealt with in a productive way by the recent proposal by Heenan and Smissen to split Nothofagus into four genera (Phytotaxa, vol. 146, http://dx.doi.org/10.11646/phytotaxa.146.1.1). Such a proposal will render the fossil record almost unworkable, and will lead to a major split in the approach taken by palynologists in comparison to other researchers. We believe the case for the new generic names, while valid, is weak, and is far outweighed by the utility of retaining Nothofagus sensu lato.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)190-193
    JournalAustralian Systematic Botany
    Issue number2-3
    Publication statusPublished - 2015


    Dive into the research topics of 'Why we should retain Nothofagus sensu lato'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this