Worldview defence and self-determination theory explain the return of racial voting: Evidence from the 2016 US election

Mark Fabian, Robert Breunig, Jan-Emmanuel de Neve

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    Abstract

    We use self-determination (SDT) and worldview defence theories (WDT) to explicate the psychological roots of identitarian voting in recent US, UK and EU elections. We test our theory using the 2016 US election as a case study, data from a representative sample of nearly half a million Americans, and a measure of racial animus derived from Google search data. We find that worry has a strong and significant positive association with Trump's vote share, as predicted by WDT. However, this is reversed in counties with high levels of relatedness—one of the three basic psychological needs emphasised by SDT. The positive relationship between racial animus and Trump also loses significance once an interaction between racial animus and relatedness is introduced. These results imply that identitarianism is driven at least in part by a desire for in-group affiliation emerging out of worldview defence and unmet basic psychological needs.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)147-166
    JournalEuropean Journal of Social Psychology
    Volume53
    Issue number1
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2022

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Worldview defence and self-determination theory explain the return of racial voting: Evidence from the 2016 US election'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this